Changes in farm management
GMEP is required to contribute to the reporting of long term trends in ecosystem health to support a wide range of other national and international reporting requirements. Two objectives for required reporting were added by the Auditor General for Wales in 2014:
- To increase the level of investment in measures for climate change adaptation with the aim of building greater resilience to ongoing climate change into both farm and forest businesses and the wider Welsh economy.
- To use agri-environment investment in way that encourages positive environmental outcomes but also contributes towards farm and forest business profitability and the wider sustainability of the rural economy.
To respond to these objectives, three additional outcomes for reporting were agreed for GMEP:
- Improving numbers of farms undertaking action concerning climate change
- Improving diversification and efficiency of farms
- Improving profitability and wider sustainability
Positive Outcomes: Glastir Impacts
GMEP was tasked with providing a baseline for assessing the future impacts of Glastir. Future field surveys will provide the main evidence for actual change in the six original intended Outcomes. The impacts of Glastir reported here relate to evidence for changes in farmer behaviour and management practices as a result of Glastir payments derived from the GMEP Farmer Practice Survey of 600 farms. These data provide information concerning the three additional Outcomes requested by the Auditor General for Wales in 2014 related to actions by farmers to combat climate change, and to improve the diversification, efficiency, and profitability of farms involved in the Glastir scheme. To provide an early insight into likely future impacts on the six original Outcomes intended for Glastir, we exploited a set of models and accounting tools to project the likely impacts of management interventions for soil, water, biodiversity, climate change and woodlands.
The following set of results appears to demonstrate a positive and diverse set of actions undertaken by farmers involved in the Glastir scheme relating to climate change, diversification, efficiency and profitability.
Improving numbers of farms undertaking action concerning climate change
- 17% increase in number of farms in scheme compared to non-scheme farms reporting they were undertaking actions concerning climate change including actions concerning flood, drought, soil erosion, biodiversity, pests and disease and heat stress (from 37% to 54%).
- 15% increase in investment by farms in scheme in on-farm renewable energy production (from 21% to 36%) although it is suspected that this is an attribute of the participants rather than an effect of scheme. Current capacity is sufficient to off-set an estimated 1% of net greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.
Improving diversification and efficiency of farms
- 4% increase in number of farms reporting they were undertaking actions to improve diversification and efficiency of their farms compared to non-scheme farms (from 16% to 20%). This included the following specific increases:
- +11% to improve nutrient efficiency
- +17% to increase business diversification (Glastir Advanced only)
- +8% to combat soil erosion
- +13% to prevent biodiversity loss
- 9.5% and 18% decrease in the average carbon footprints expressed per kg of lamb live weight and milk on surveyed farms in receipt of Glastir Efficiency Grants, indicating improved production efficiency. These results include embedded emissions resulting from the production and transport footprints of materials bought and used by the farm (such as animal feeds, fertilisers and plastic sheeting in the Bangor Carbon Footprinting Tool). These embedded emissions are not included in current national inventories but are important to consider if emissions are not to be exported, thus complying with the WFG goal of a Globally Responsible Wales.
Improving profitability and wider sustainability
- 77% of respondents stated farm viability had increased as a consequence of receiving the Glastir Efficiency Grant, with 21% reporting no change.
- More than 90% of respondents agreed that the Glastir Efficiency Grants had encouraged them to undertake new capital investments whilst 83% agreed that access to the grant increased their scale of planned investment.
Areas for concern or further action needed: Glastir Impacts
Benefits for diffuse pollution and greenhouse gas emissions at the national-scale may not be as great as intended. The GMEP results suggest a variety of reasons for this including: a) payments for maintaining interventions from past schemes reducing the additionality effect of Glastir; b) complexity of the scheme and barriers to adopting (e.g. woodland grants); and c) a relatively distributed action not always targeted in areas of greatest need (diffuse pollution interventions not aligned to high fertiliser leaching areas). Individual farm level improvements for diffuse pollution and carbon footprints can be significantly higher.
The following set of results appears to demonstrate areas of concern and/or a need for further action in the Glastir scheme:
Improving profitability and wider sustainability
- 34% of participants in the Glastir Entry and Advanced schemes agreed that participation in an agri-environment scheme had 'changed my management of the farm' compared to 61% of participants in the Tir Cynnal or Tir Gofal schemes. The response by the Glastir participants was unaffected by any history of participation in the previous schemes. It should be noted this may reflect the intention of providing legacy and continuity between schemes.
- There was no reliable evidence of a change in the overall number of persons employed on farm, although farm diversification was most frequently associated with an increase.